How can we help?

Identify, Analyse, Effect

Understanding the effect on readers is crucial in argument analysis, comprising 50% of the marking criteria. Students learn to identify persuasive techniques, analyze their impact, and construct detailed effect analyses, focusing on how demographics influence responses and encouraging deeper engagement with texts.

Purpose

💡
As part of each of these modules, there will be a purpose that connects back to VCE English.
Understanding effect on reader is fundamental to argument analysis, as it represents 50% of the marking criteria. This core skill requires students to analyze how persuasive techniques may influence readers' thoughts, feelings, and reactions. Through a structured approach of Identify (20%), Analyze (30%), and Effect (50%), students learn to dissect how writers craft their arguments to create specific impacts on their audience.

Post-Module Learnings

💡
Following this module, these are the following skills you should have.
I I am able to analyse how language techniques impact a reader's thoughts, feelings, and reactions.
I am able to identify and explain how different demographics (age groups, backgrounds, experiences) might respond differently to persuasive techniques.
I am able to construct detailed effect analysis considering immediate emotional responses, deeper cognitive impacts, and potential behavioral changes in readers.
💡
Want an interactive slideshow of the notes below? Click here:

Content

Core Principles & Marking Breakdown

The Fundamental Truth About Marking

According to VCE marking criteria, your argument analysis chunks are scored as follows:
  1. Identify the Technique: 10-20% of the mark
  1. Analysing the Quote and Going In-Depth on Context: 30%
  1. Effect on Reader: 50% or more
Critical Insight: Effect on Reader is where "most of the marks are stored." Half your analytical effort should focus on exploring how techniques impact readers.

The Three-Part Framework

Each "chunk" of analysis contains three essential components:

Chunk Parameters

  • Length: 1-3 sentences (typically 2 sentences)
  • Techniques per chunk: 1-3 techniques (don't analyse in isolation)
  • Structure: First sentence often covers Identify + Analyse; second sentence develops Effect

IDENTIFY: The Foundation (20%)

What Identification Really Means

Identification is NOT just naming a technique. It requires:
  1. Technique name (formal or informal, 2-6 words)
  1. Direct quote from the text (2-6 words preferred)
  1. Context of where/how the technique appears

The Hierarchy of Technique Names

❌ AVOID Generic Labels:

  • "The author uses emotive language"
  • "The author uses many inclusive language" (grammatically incorrect + vague)
  • "The author uses statistics"
  • "The author uses a rhetorical question"

✅ PREFER Specific Descriptions:

  • "Through the visceral imagery of children 'deteriorating day by day'"
  • "Commencing with the alarming figure of '47% surge in youth crime'"
  • "Via the rhetorical challenge 'How many more children must suffer?'"

Deep Dive: Identification Formulas

Formula 1: Technique + Quote

Formula 2: Action + Technique + Quote

Formula 3: Contextual Introduction + Technique + Quote

Sample Identification Transformations

Basic: The author uses inclusive language. Better: The author employs inclusive pronouns like "we" and "our". Best: Through the possessive plea "our children need protection," the author...
Basic: Statistics are used to show the problem. Better: The "42% increase" statistic demonstrates... Best: Quantifying the crisis through the "42% of families affected" figure...

Critical Warning from Marking Experience

"Don't ever say, the author uses many inclusive language, when there is only 1 inclusive language. The author uses a plethora of imagery… just analyse one piece of imagery please."
Key Takeaway: One technique analysed well > multiple techniques mentioned superficially

ANALYSE: The Critical Bridge (30%)

What Analysis Actually Means

Analysis is NOT:
  • Defining what the technique is
  • Explaining how the technique works generally
  • Repeating what the quote says
Analysis IS:
  • Examining connotations of specific words IN CONTEXT
  • Exploring how word choices create meaning
  • Setting up the effect through deeper examination

The Four Pillars of Contextual Analysis

1. Lexical Analysis (Word-Level Examination)

Example 1: "insidious grip"
Example 2: "abandoned our children"

2. Contextual Connotations

Words gain different meanings in different contexts:
"Grip" in different contexts:
  • Sports context: "firm grip" = control, mastery
  • Addiction context: "insidious grip" = entrapment, powerlessness
  • Business context: "losing grip" = declining influence
Sample Analysis:

3. Juxtaposition and Contrast

Example: "medicine and commerce collide"

4. Cumulative Meaning

Example: "failed," "neglected," and "abandoned"

Analysis Development Exercises

Exercise: Develop analysis for "catastrophic failure"
Context: Government's response to natural disasters
Student attempt: "Catastrophic means very bad and failure means not succeeding."
Improved analysis:

The Bridge Function

Analysis must SET UP the effect. Consider how analysis prepares for effect:

EFFECT: Where the Marks Live (50%)

The Three-Stage Effect Formula

According to Week 10 notes, effects should progress through:
  1. Initial Response: Build excitement/emotion/recognition
  1. Deeper Impact: Add accountability/responsibility/realisation
  1. Call to Action: Offer hope/change/solution

Demographic Targeting

Different readers = different effects. Always consider:
  • Age groups (parents, youth, elderly)
  • Political leanings (conservative, progressive)
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Professional backgrounds
  • Personal experiences

Effect Development Patterns

Pattern 1: Recognition → Responsibility → Action

Pattern 2: Shock → Anger → Mobilisation

Pattern 3: Validation → Unity → Empowerment

Sophisticated Effect Language

Tentative Phrasing (Essential for high marks):

  • "may recognise"
  • "likely compels"
  • "potentially galvanises"
  • "could prompt"
  • "might induce"
  • "seeks to inspire"
  • "attempts to mobilise"

Action Verbs for Reader Response:

  • Emotional: sympathise, empathise, recoil, bristle
  • Cognitive: recognise, realise, reconsider, recalibrate
  • Behavioural: scrutinise, demand, advocate, mobilise

Effect Writing Formulas

Formula 1: Demographic + Recognition + Action

Example:

Formula 2: Immediate Impact + Deeper Reflection + Broader Implication

Example:

Sample Effect Progressions by Issue

Climate Change Article:

Youth Crime Editorial:

Healthcare Crisis Piece:


Complete Chunk Construction

The Anatomy of a Perfect Chunk

Let's dissect a high-scoring chunk:
Breakdown:
  • Identify (15%): "stark revelation that '42% of renters sacrifice over half their income to housing'"
  • Analyse (35%): "transforms abstract economic anxiety... strips away comfortable assumptions... mathematical impossibility"
  • Effect (50%): "forcing middle-class readers... unsettling recognition... children's futures..."

Chunk Construction Workshop

Step 1: Select Your Technique + Quote

Article: Government's response to aged care crisis Technique: Metaphor Quote: "warehouses for the elderly"

Step 2: Develop Contextual Analysis

Consider:
  • What are the connotations of "warehouses"?
  • How does this contrast with "care homes"?
  • What does this reveal about treatment?
Analysis:

Step 3: Craft Multi-Layered Effect

Effect:

Sample Chunks by Technique Type

Anecdotal Evidence

Statistical Evidence

Expert Opinion


Image Analysis Integration

The Golden Rules of Image Analysis

  1. Never analyse images in isolation - always connect to textual techniques
  1. Use compositional terminology: foreground, midground, background
  1. Analyse specific elements, not the whole image
  1. Consider how images compound textual arguments

Image Analysis Vocabulary

Compositional Terms:

  • Foreground: Immediate visual impact, usually the main subject
  • Midground: Supporting elements, context
  • Background: Environmental/atmospheric elements

Visual Techniques:

  • Positioning, scale, perspective
  • Colour symbolism, contrast
  • Facial expressions, body language
  • Symbolic objects, visual metaphors

Integrated Image-Text Analysis

Example 1: Vaping Article + Product Image

Example 2: Climate Protest + Crowd Image

Image Analysis Integration Strategies

Strategy 1: Image as Evidence

Use the image to prove/disprove textual claims:

Strategy 2: Image as Amplification

Use the image to intensify textual arguments:

Strategy 3: Image as Revelation

Use the image to add layers unstated in text:

Body Paragraph Architecture

The Complete Structure

According to the notes, a full body paragraph contains:
  1. Topic Sentence (Tone + Approach + Target)
  1. Chunk 1 (Foundation technique)
  1. Chunk 2 (Building technique)
  1. Chunk 3 (Culminating technique - can include image)
  1. Linking Sentence (Connection to overall argument)

Topic Sentence Formulas

Formula 1: Tone + Approach + Purpose

Formula 2: Strategic Opening + Target Audience

Formula 3: Rhetorical Strategy + Intended Outcome

Complete Body Paragraph Samples

Sample 1: Support → Condemn → Solution Structure

Context: Article about youth climate activism

Sample 2: Victim → Condemn → Solution Structure

Context: Editorial on housing affordability crisis

Linking Sentence Strategies

Strategy 1: Synthesis

Strategy 2: Culmination

Strategy 3: Transformation


Advanced Strategies

Multi-Technique Integration

Rather than analysing techniques separately, weave them together:

Technique Layering

Show how techniques build upon each other:

Demographic Intersection

Consider how different reader groups interact:

Common Errors & Solutions

Error 1: Generic Sentence Starters

Weak: "This shows that readers will feel sad about the issue."
Strong: "Such visceral imagery likely triggers parental anguish as they recognise their own vulnerabilities within Sturgess's narrative."

Error 2: Technique Name Obsession

Weak: "The author uses a metaphor which is effective."
Strong: "Through the industrial metaphor of 'processing plants' for schools, Chen strips education of its humanistic pretensions."

Error 3: Missing Contextual Analysis

Weak: "The word 'abandoned' is emotive."
Strong: "Within the childcare context, 'abandoned' transcends mere neglect to evoke primal childhood fears of desertion, transforming policy failure into psychological trauma."

Error 4: Vague Effects

Weak: "Readers will be concerned about this issue."
Strong: "Middle-class parents previously insulated by private school options may experience creeping recognition that systemic education failure threatens even their purchased advantages."

Error 5: Definitive Claims

Weak: "All readers will definitely demand change."
Strong: "Such exposure likely galvanises politically engaged readers toward electoral punishment while potentially inspiring previously apathetic citizens toward first-time activism."

Error 6: Isolated Image Analysis

Weak: "The image shows protesters looking angry."
Strong: "Complementing textual warnings about 'civic unrest,' the photograph's foregrounded protester's raised fist transforms abstract political dissatisfaction into embodied physical resistance."

Final Mastery Checklist

Before submitting any chunk, verify:
Identify: Specific technique named with embedded quote?
Analyse: Contextual connotations explored, not just definitions?
Effect: 50% of chunk exploring reader impact?
Language: Tentative phrasing (may, likely, could)?
Demographics: Specific reader groups considered?
Flow: Avoiding "This/The" sentence starters?
Evidence: Supporting quotes throughout?
Context: Words analysed within their specific situation?
Progression: Clear journey from identification to impact?
Integration: Techniques woven together, not listed separately?
Remember: Excellence in argument analysis comes not from identifying maximum techniques but from demonstrating sophisticated understanding of how language manipulates specific audiences within particular contexts. Every word matters, every reaction counts, every effect deserves exploration.